Click Here for Magazine Sites and Subscriptions


















TruckCraft Avalanche Snow & Ice Control Meyer Protech - Snow Pusher Blizzard Snowplows The Snow Plow
Western Kage Innovation Fisher Buyer's Digest Hiniker Tim Wallace Snow Plow Supply Bob Cat


Go Back   PlowSite.com™ - Snow Plowing & Ice Management Forum > Snow & Ice Forums > Commercial Snow Removal

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-19-2012, 10:21 AM
PhilFromErie PhilFromErie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Erie, PA
Posts: 241
Really big tractors?

Does anyone here uses large, 300 hp plus tractors to push snow? More specifically A Case 9270. It already had a front lift hitch so I can adapt a box to it very easily. The only thing I'm wondering about is fuel consumption, would it be so thirsty that it wouldn't be worth it to use.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-19-2012, 10:32 AM
bcbrouwer bcbrouwer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 31
well it uses a 14.0l, 855ci engine, burns about 65 liters per hour (17-18 gal) at load. you'd have to have a humungous blade/pusher and area to make it efficent. it would push a lot of snow though!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-19-2012, 10:39 AM
PhilFromErie PhilFromErie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Erie, PA
Posts: 241
Yea it'll burn that at full load making a big cut with the scraper or a big ripper, but with a box pushing snow I would think may be half that. I was hoping someone would have tried it to give me some insight.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-19-2012, 10:43 AM
RLM RLM is online now
PlowSite.com Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hilton, NY
Posts: 1,127
This probably doesnt help. Our tractors that have inverted blowers on them cost about 25% in fuel what it cost to plow the same route with a truck.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-19-2012, 11:15 AM
JD Dave's Avatar
JD Dave JD Dave is online now
2000 Club Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Caledon, Ontario Canada
Posts: 9,950
We use to plow with 3 Versatiles and they were 330 horse and they were really good on fuel. Generally your just idling with a tractor with that much horse power. You have to be carefull with that much wait behind you as if you hook something it's going to break something. Our 8000 Deere doesn't actually burn hardly any more fuel then our small 7's now.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jmac View Post
There will be an all knowing young kid to say otherwise but trust me, you dont want to run these with a vbox
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-19-2012, 01:03 PM
PhilFromErie PhilFromErie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Erie, PA
Posts: 241
Thanks Dave, that's what I was hoping to hear.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-19-2012, 07:06 PM
PhilFromErie PhilFromErie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Erie, PA
Posts: 241
What size pusher did you use on them? I'll probably use a 18 footer.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-19-2012, 07:32 PM
JD Dave's Avatar
JD Dave JD Dave is online now
2000 Club Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Caledon, Ontario Canada
Posts: 9,950
This was years ago and pushers really weren't out then. We only had 14ft angle blades on them. I was just a kid when we used them, I'm going by what my dad has told me. You need really flat lots for anything bigger then a 16 ft pusher unless you want to scrape it again with a smaller blade. Not sure the type of lots you do.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jmac View Post
There will be an all knowing young kid to say otherwise but trust me, you dont want to run these with a vbox
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-19-2012, 09:58 PM
greywynd greywynd is online now
PlowSite.com Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Peterborough, Ontario
Posts: 1,070
One outfit here has run either an 18 or 20' blade on a 9620, I think it was a Daniels blade with the manual wings. (Though with duals still on not sure if they folded them in or not!)

They ran that for a couple years, but I think the blade got remounted and put on a loader instead a year or two ago. Like Dave says, that length of blade (or box) needs large flat surfaces to be effective on. This was only used on a few particular lots and all were along large roads that were easy to travel on.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-19-2012, 11:40 PM
Plow More's Avatar
Plow More Plow More is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 163
On that wide of a pusher I would think a sectional would be the only to go
__________________
1999 F-250 4 Door, Short flat bed, 7.3l 6spd,8' Western Pro Plow w/ wings
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-24-2012, 08:12 PM
K&L Salting K&L Salting is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Indianapolis West Side
Posts: 54
four wheel drive Deere

I have a 300hp Deere with duals weighs about 32000 pounds that I only use a 12ft front deere blade with sides welded to the blade. I have a 200 hp front wheel assist Massey Ferguson with a loader, no dual weighs about 24000 pounds with a 12ft boss that will out push the full time four wheel drive. The Deere will spin out and the Massey Ferguson doesn't. Each uses about 5 gal. per hour.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:36 AM.


Our Links:  LawnSite.com - TreeServicesSite.com - DesignBuildSite.com - SportsFieldSite.com - NurseryManSite.com - Moose River Media - Turf Magazine - SportsField Management Magazine - Tree Services Magazine - Turf Design Build Magazine - FarmingForumSite.com - Farming Magazine - Growing Magazine - Superintendent Magazine - American Nurseryman - Moose River Media Source Book

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012 PlowSite.com™ Moose River Media

Page generated in 0.02203 seconds with 9 queries